Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorKleinnijenhuis, Jande
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-23T13:13:23Z
dc.date.available2018-10-23T13:13:23Z
dc.date.issued2018de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2439de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/59762
dc.description.abstractThe success of tech firms rests on their ownership of the algorithms for operating new platforms for the interactions among five groups of stakeholders in the markets of news, ads, and chats: stakeholders from the spheres of politics, journalism, the citizenry, the tech firms themselves, and other firms. Recent regulations that touch on property rights such as the German Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz and the European Directive on Copyright in the Digital Market have turned ownership of algorithms into exclusive ownership. Thereby tech firms obtain also the right to censor and the exclusive right to micro-target clients for advertisers. Coase’s theorem is used to discuss alternative allocations of property rights that could improve the quality of news, ads, and chats.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPublizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesende
dc.subject.ddcNews media, journalism, publishingen
dc.subject.ddcRechtde
dc.subject.ddcLawen
dc.subject.otherproperty rights; tech industryde
dc.titleNews, Ads, Chats, and Property Rights over Algorithmsde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtetde
dc.description.reviewrevieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/1601de
dc.source.journalMedia and Communication
dc.source.volume6de
dc.publisher.countryMISC
dc.source.issue3de
dc.subject.classozinteraktive, elektronische Mediende
dc.subject.classozInteractive, electronic Mediaen
dc.subject.classozRechtde
dc.subject.classozLawen
dc.subject.thesozSoziale Mediende
dc.subject.thesozsocial mediaen
dc.subject.thesozAlgorithmusde
dc.subject.thesozalgorithmen
dc.subject.thesozEigentumsrechtde
dc.subject.thesozright of ownershipen
dc.subject.thesozUrheberrechtde
dc.subject.thesozcopyrighten
dc.subject.thesozZensurde
dc.subject.thesozcensorshipen
dc.subject.thesozNetzwerkde
dc.subject.thesoznetworken
dc.subject.thesozNachrichtende
dc.subject.thesoznewsen
dc.subject.thesozChatde
dc.subject.thesozchaten
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10094228
internal.identifier.thesoz10035039
internal.identifier.thesoz10041550
internal.identifier.thesoz10040422
internal.identifier.thesoz10055166
internal.identifier.thesoz10053141
internal.identifier.thesoz10052870
internal.identifier.thesoz10065796
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo77-82de
internal.identifier.classoz1080404
internal.identifier.classoz40101
internal.identifier.journal793
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc070
internal.identifier.ddc340
dc.source.issuetopicMultidisciplinary Studies in Media and Communicationde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i3.1601de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review2
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/1601
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record