dc.contributor.author | McLeod, Fraser | de |
dc.contributor.author | Macbeth, Jared | de |
dc.contributor.author | Viswanathan, Leela | de |
dc.contributor.author | Whitelaw, Graham S. | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-08-10T07:05:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-10T07:05:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 2183-7635 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/58377 | |
dc.description.abstract | Indigenous rights are crucial to contemporary land use planning and policy in settler states. This article comparatively analyzes the manifest and latent content of the 2014 Provincial Policy Statement of Ontario, Canada (PPS) and the 1999 Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement of Aotearoa New Zealand (ACRPS) in order to evaluate their relative capacity to recognize the rights of Indigenous peoples. While the results show that jurisdiction is an impediment to fostering common ground between Indigenous peoples and settler states, the authors conclude that the PPS and the ACRPS serve vital roles in building dialogue and equitable planning outcomes. | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Landscaping and area planning | en |
dc.subject.ddc | Städtebau, Raumplanung, Landschaftsgestaltung | de |
dc.subject.other | Aotearoa; Auckland; Canada; Indigenous; comparative policy; land use planning | de |
dc.title | Getting to Common Ground: A Comparison of Ontario, Canada's Provincial Policy Statement and the Auckland Council Regional Policy Statement with Respect to Indigenous Peoples | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/850 | de |
dc.source.journal | Urban Planning | |
dc.source.volume | 2 | de |
dc.publisher.country | PRT | |
dc.source.issue | 1 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Area Development Planning, Regional Research | en |
dc.subject.classoz | Raumplanung und Regionalforschung | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 | en |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 | de |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.source.pageinfo | 72-87 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 20700 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 794 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 710 | |
dc.source.issuetopic | Urban Forms and Future Cities | de |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v2i1.850 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
internal.identifier.licence | 16 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.dda.reference | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/850 | |
ssoar.urn.registration | false | de |