Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorSchmitt, Sarah Mariade
dc.contributor.authorHartmann, Thomasde
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-09T15:26:35Z
dc.date.available2018-08-09T15:26:35Z
dc.date.issued2016de
dc.identifier.issn2183-7635de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/58371
dc.description.abstractHow do different concepts of justice correspond with the principles of diversity in cities introduced by Jane Jacobs? This contribution connects Jane Jacobs’ ideas on the diverse city with Mary Douglas’ Cultural Theory and its concept of clumsy solutions. According to Douglas’ Cultural Theory, every social situation can be described in terms of the four ideal-typical “rationalities”: individualism, egalitarianism, hierarchism, and fatalism. These four rationalities are again linked to different concepts of justice: libertarian, utilitarian, or social justice. Douglas’ Cultural Theory assumes that in every social situation all four of those rationalities emerge in some way and concludes that if a situation is not poly-rational, it is less robust. This opts for imperfect and “clumsy solutions”. It is argued that clumsy solutions, the four rationalities and related concepts fit Jane Jacobs’ claim for more diversity in urban design. This essentially calls for imperfect cities by design, ‘built’ by Jacobs’ generators for diversity. Although this outcome might not be revolutionary in the current debates about urban design, the concept of clumsy solutions provide a foundation for Jane Jacobs’ atheoretical claim for a diverse city. This contributes to new reflections on the urban planning paradigms of Jane Jacobs.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcLandscaping and area planningen
dc.subject.ddcStädtebau, Raumplanung, Landschaftsgestaltungde
dc.subject.otherCultural Theory; Jane Jacobs; Mary Douglas; clumsy solutions; diversity; just city; libertarianism; social justice; urban design; utilitarianismde
dc.titleClumsy City by Design - A Theory for Jane Jacobs' Imperfect Cities?de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/732de
dc.source.journalUrban Planning
dc.source.volume1de
dc.publisher.countryPRT
dc.source.issue4de
dc.subject.classozArea Development Planning, Regional Researchen
dc.subject.classozRaumplanung und Regionalforschungde
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo42-50de
internal.identifier.classoz20700
internal.identifier.journal794
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc710
dc.source.issuetopicParadigm Shifts in Urban Planningde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v1i4.732de
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/732
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record