Show simple item record

Participation of Russia and Turkey in the Political Processes of the South Caucasus (1918)
[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorAmbartsumyan, Karinede
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-03T07:46:37Z
dc.date.available2018-07-03T07:46:36Z
dc.date.available2018-07-03T07:46:37Z
dc.date.issued2018de
dc.identifier.issn1998-9938de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/57793
dc.description.abstractThe article studies the influence of Russia and Turkey on the political development of the South Caucasus in 1918. The choice of 1918 year is conditioned by its transitivity in the relations of two countries with regard to the Caucasus region: peace treaty was concluded, but cooperation was not achieved yet. After the fall of the monarchy Russia entered the stage of reconstruction, while Turkey was on the verge of the final fall of the Young Turks. For both countries the territory of the South Caucasus became the stage of political struggle for realizing imperial ambitions and an attempt to prevent the final territorial disintegration of states. The author shows a difference between Russian and Turkish political approaches. Turkey acted directly, holding negotiations and introducing troops, while Russia had no contacts with Caucasus officials and tried to weaken the Turkish activity in the region through Germany. The conflict nature of the region, which had earlier been suppressed by the power of Russian monarchy, was revealed now. The author presents the political development of the South Caucasus in the form of evolution from the idea of autonomy within the Russian statehood to the proclamation of independence of Georgia, Azerbaijan and Armenia. Considering the South Caucasus political development in the international context is conditioned by dependence on external challenges, which determined the decisions and actions of Caucasian political elites. On the one hand, the newly formed Caucasian governments declared their independence at the international level. On the other hand, these governments were dependent on the leaders of world politics in achieving their goals. The participation of Russia and Turkey in the political processes in the South Caucasus was associated with the contradictory aims. Both parties didn’t want to be eliminated from the Caucasian region. At the same time, they tried to avoid military conflict. The Turkish government’s motivation to use the military power consisted in the need to protect the Muslim population, but not in opposition to Russia. In general, year 1918 marked two opposite perspectives for both countries: for Russia - the loss of the Caucasus as a territory and a sphere of influence; for Turkey - strengthening positions through the local Muslim population.en
dc.languagerude
dc.subject.ddcStaatsformen und Regierungssystemede
dc.subject.ddcSystems of governments & statesen
dc.subject.otherSouth Caucasus; Revolution of 1917; Brest Treaty; Trabizond Conference; Batum Conference; Transcaucasian Sejm; Young Turks, Bolsheviksde
dc.titleУчастие России и Турции в политических процессах Южного Кавказа в 1918 годуde
dc.title.alternativeParticipation of Russia and Turkey in the Political Processes of the South Caucasus (1918)en
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalScience Journal of Volgograd State University: History - Area Studies - International Relations
dc.source.volume23de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozStaat, staatliche Organisationsformende
dc.subject.classozPolitical System, Constitution, Governmenten
dc.subject.thesozpolitical independenceen
dc.subject.thesozInteressenpolitikde
dc.subject.thesozpressure-group politicsen
dc.subject.thesozterritorial sovereigntyen
dc.subject.thesozregionen
dc.subject.thesozpeace treatyen
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Entwicklungde
dc.subject.thesozRusslandde
dc.subject.thesozFriedensvertragde
dc.subject.thesozFriedensverhandlungde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical stabilityen
dc.subject.thesozRussiaen
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Unabhängigkeitde
dc.subject.thesozRegionde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical developmenten
dc.subject.thesozTürkeide
dc.subject.thesozTurkeyen
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Stabilitätde
dc.subject.thesozGebietshoheitde
dc.subject.thesozpeace negotiationen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-57793-3
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
ssoar.contributor.institutionVolgograd State Universityde
internal.statusnoch nicht fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10034369
internal.identifier.thesoz10044373
internal.identifier.thesoz10047745
internal.identifier.thesoz10044625
internal.identifier.thesoz10040704
internal.identifier.thesoz10036847
internal.identifier.thesoz10044637
internal.identifier.thesoz10044381
internal.identifier.thesoz10057012
internal.identifier.thesoz10044378
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo166-176de
internal.identifier.classoz10503
internal.identifier.journal847
internal.identifier.document32
dc.rights.sherpaBlue Publisheren
dc.rights.sherpaBlauer Verlagde
internal.identifier.ddc321
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2018.2.14de
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.sherpa2
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
dc.subject.classhort10500de
internal.embargo.terms2018-04-27
internal.pdf.version1.4
internal.pdf.validtrue
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record