Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorHaddadi, Mahdide
dc.contributor.authorRaad, Mohammad Mohsenide
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-11T09:13:42Z
dc.date.available2018-04-11T09:13:42Z
dc.date.issued2015de
dc.identifier.issn2300-2697de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.scipress.com/ILSHS.62.91.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/56782
dc.description.abstractPublic interest theory in governance and its reflection in Constitution Law are recently emerging in public law literature. Its concept and function differs country-by-country based on governing ideology of the society. Liberal states usually construe this theory by considering individual orientation and social states by society priority. The concept of public interest and the mechanism to achieve it in law and ethics philosophy in general and in Iranian Constitution in particular is a disputing discussion. We assume that any school construes public interest by its selected ideology in law philosophy and political theory. Likewise, by Iranian Constitution Law, it is perceived that respecting expediency especially "system expediency" has broad usage in governance especially upon revolution. Although respecting customary expediency does not seem so surprising.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcRechtde
dc.subject.ddcLawen
dc.subject.ddcPhilosophiede
dc.subject.ddcPhilosophyen
dc.titleGradual transformation of public interest theory and its status in Iranian constitution lawde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalInternational Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences
dc.publisher.countryCHE
dc.source.issue62de
dc.subject.classozRechtde
dc.subject.classozPhilosophy, Ethics, Religionen
dc.subject.classozPhilosophie, Theologiede
dc.subject.classozLawen
dc.subject.thesozRechtsphilosophiede
dc.subject.thesozIranen
dc.subject.thesozVerfassungde
dc.subject.thesozIrande
dc.subject.thesozacten
dc.subject.thesozgovernmenten
dc.subject.thesozöffentliches Interessede
dc.subject.thesozRegierungde
dc.subject.thesozphilosophy of lawen
dc.subject.thesozRechtde
dc.subject.thesozconstitutionen
dc.subject.thesozGesetzde
dc.subject.thesozlawen
dc.subject.thesozpublic interesten
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10046005
internal.identifier.thesoz10054521
internal.identifier.thesoz10034346
internal.identifier.thesoz10036846
internal.identifier.thesoz10040090
internal.identifier.thesoz10040087
internal.identifier.thesoz10044977
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo91-98de
internal.identifier.classoz30100
internal.identifier.classoz40101
internal.identifier.journal1120
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc340
internal.identifier.ddc100
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.62.91de
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencexml-database-34@@9
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record