| dc.contributor.author | Mantula, Lilia | de |
| dc.contributor.author | Khasanova, Svetlana | de |
| dc.contributor.author | Antoshkina, Ekaterina | de |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-03-19T14:41:10Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-03-19T14:41:10Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | de |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2304-120X | de |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/56489 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The Article reflects the characteristic differences between male and female logic. The main differences between the methods of thinking of men and women are reflected. A comparative analysis of the behavior of men and women in conflict situations is conducted. The main features of the male and female logic are shown. Specific examples illustrating the behavior of men and women from the point of view of logic are given. | en |
| dc.language | ru | de |
| dc.subject.ddc | Psychology | en |
| dc.subject.ddc | Psychologie | de |
| dc.subject.other | male logic; female logic; deductive method | de |
| dc.title | Логическое мышление - развитие логики | de |
| dc.title.alternative | Logical thinking - the development of logic | de |
| dc.description.review | begutachtet | de |
| dc.description.review | reviewed | en |
| dc.source.journal | Koncept (Kirov): Scientific and Methodological e-magazine | |
| dc.publisher.country | RUS | |
| dc.subject.classoz | Allgemeine Psychologie | de |
| dc.subject.classoz | General Psychology | en |
| dc.subject.thesoz | thinking | en |
| dc.subject.thesoz | Deduktion | de |
| dc.subject.thesoz | deduction | en |
| dc.subject.thesoz | geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren | de |
| dc.subject.thesoz | gender-specific factors | en |
| dc.subject.thesoz | Induktion | de |
| dc.subject.thesoz | induction | en |
| dc.subject.thesoz | Denken | de |
| dc.subject.thesoz | logic | en |
| dc.subject.thesoz | Logik | de |
| dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-56489-8 | |
| dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 | en |
| dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 | de |
| internal.status | noch nicht fertig erschlossen | de |
| internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040612 | |
| internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040613 | |
| internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040717 | |
| internal.identifier.thesoz | 10045237 | |
| internal.identifier.thesoz | 10043870 | |
| dc.type.stock | article | de |
| dc.type.document | journal article | en |
| dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
| internal.identifier.classoz | 10703 | |
| internal.identifier.journal | 416 | |
| internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
| internal.identifier.ddc | 150 | |
| dc.description.pubstatus | Unknown | en |
| dc.description.pubstatus | unbekannt | de |
| internal.identifier.licence | 16 | |
| internal.identifier.pubstatus | 4 | |
| internal.identifier.review | 2 | |
| dc.subject.classhort | 30100 | de |
| internal.pdf.version | 1.5 | |
| internal.pdf.valid | true | |
| internal.pdf.wellformed | true | |
| internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizer | CERTAIN | |
| internal.check.languageharmonizer | CERTAIN_RETAINED | |
