dc.contributor.author | Danner, Daniel | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-03-14T09:49:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-03-14T09:49:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/56382 | |
dc.description.abstract | Reliability describes the precision of a measurement. This contribution begins by defining the concept of reliability and explaining why the reliability of a measurement is relevant. It then discusses the model assumptions that must be made in order to estimate the reliability of a measurement, and it presents five methods of estimating reliability: the test-retest method, the parallel-forms method, the split-half method, the internal consistency method, and the estimation of reliability using structural equation modelling. The contribution concludes with a brief outline of the commonalities and differences between classical test theory and the item response theory and the importance of these theories for the estimation of reliability. | en |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Social sciences, sociology, anthropology | en |
dc.title | Reliability - the Precision of a Measurement (Version 2.0) | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.publisher.country | DEU | |
dc.publisher.city | Mannheim | de |
dc.source.series | GESIS Survey Guidelines | |
dc.subject.classoz | Erhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaften | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Methods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methods | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Theorievergleich | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | theory comparison | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Messinstrument | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | measurement instrument | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Reliabilität | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | reliability | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Messtheorie | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | measurement theory | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Messung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | measurement | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Qualität | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | quality | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Korrelation | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | correlation | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Umfrageforschung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | survey research | en |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 | en |
ssoar.contributor.institution | GESIS | de |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10060251 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10041769 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10056537 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10052156 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10036930 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037327 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10049791 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040714 | |
dc.type.stock | monograph | de |
dc.type.document | Arbeitspapier | de |
dc.type.document | working paper | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 10 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10105 | |
internal.identifier.document | 3 | |
dc.contributor.corporateeditor | GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften | |
internal.identifier.corporateeditor | 133 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 300 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.15465/gesis-sg_en_011 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Erstveröffentlichung | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Primary Publication | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 20 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 5 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.identifier.series | 1376 | |
ssoar.wgl.collection | true | de |
internal.pdf.version | 1.5 | |
internal.pdf.valid | false | |
internal.pdf.wellformed | false | |
internal.pdf.ocr | null Page_2 Page_3 Page_11 Page_12 | |
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizer | CERTAIN | |
internal.check.languageharmonizer | CERTAIN_RETAINED | |