Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorProshin, Denisde
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-13T08:21:26Z
dc.date.available2018-03-13T08:21:26Z
dc.date.issued2016de
dc.identifier.issn2300-2697de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.scipress.com/ILSHS.68.49.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/56349
dc.description.abstractDemocratic regimes’ resorting to excessive force when fighting against terrorists is chrestomathically defined as “deviations” or “mistakes”. However, the frequency with which such “deviations” and “mistakes” take place and regular repetition of several scenarios give us the right to speak not so much about random dysfunctions as about standard political situations in whose framework, contrary to assertions of democracies’ immanent softness and moderation in administering violence even to their avowed enemies, democratic regimes with high probability can apply excessive force to their armed antagonists. This article wants to probe deeper into the question of the causes of such behaviour of democratic governments and to outline most probable sociopolitical scenarios of these governments’ falling into excess while combating terrorists.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.otherCounterterrorism; Democracy; Excessive Force; Illiberal Democracy; Terrorismde
dc.titleSlipping Off the Edge: How and why Democratic Regimes Fall into Excess in their Fight against Terrorismde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalInternational Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences
dc.publisher.countryCHE
dc.source.issue68de
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.thesozTerrorismusde
dc.subject.thesozterrorismen
dc.subject.thesozTerrorismusbekämpfungde
dc.subject.thesozfight against terrorismen
dc.subject.thesozDemokratiede
dc.subject.thesozdemocracyen
dc.subject.thesozSozialpolitikde
dc.subject.thesozsocial policyen
dc.subject.thesozGewaltde
dc.subject.thesozviolenceen
dc.subject.thesozDemokratieverständnisde
dc.subject.thesozconception of democracyen
dc.subject.thesozKonfliktstrategiede
dc.subject.thesozconflict strategyen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10060156
internal.identifier.thesoz10081893
internal.identifier.thesoz10037672
internal.identifier.thesoz10036537
internal.identifier.thesoz10034720
internal.identifier.thesoz10040683
internal.identifier.thesoz10049503
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo49-54de
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.journal1120
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.68.49de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencexml-database-29@@6
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record