Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorGideon, Michael
dc.contributor.authorHsu, Joanne
dc.contributor.authorHelppie-McFall, Brooke
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-23T11:50:33Z
dc.date.available2017-10-23T11:50:33Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1864-3361
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/54383
dc.description.abstract"Survey responses to quantitative financial questions frequently display strong patterns of heaping at round numbers. This paper uses two studies to examine variation in rounding across questions and by individual characteristics. Rounding was more common for respondents low in ability, for respondents low in motivation, and for more difficult questions, all consistent with theories of satisficing. Questions that require more difficult information retrieval and integration of information exhibit more heaping. The use of records, which lowers task difficulty, reduces rounding as well. Higher episodic memory is associated with less rounding, and standard measures of motivation are negatively associated with rounding. These relationships, along with the fact that longer response latencies are associated with less rounding, all support the idea that rounding is a manifestation of satisficing on open-ended financial questions. Rounding patterns also appear remarkably similar across the two studies, despite being fielded in different modes and employing different question order and wording." (author's abstract)en
dc.languageen
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherfinancial survey; satisficing; rounding; heaping; survey response
dc.titleHeaping at Round Numbers on Financial Questions: The Role of Satisficing
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalSurvey Research Methods
dc.source.volume11
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.source.issue2
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozUmfrageforschungde
dc.subject.thesozsurvey researchen
dc.subject.thesozInterviewde
dc.subject.thesozinterviewen
dc.subject.thesozOnline-Befragungde
dc.subject.thesozonline surveyen
dc.subject.thesozEinkommende
dc.subject.thesozincomeen
dc.subject.thesozfinanzielle Situationde
dc.subject.thesozfinancial situationen
dc.subject.thesozAntwortverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozresponse behavioren
dc.subject.thesozDatenqualitätde
dc.subject.thesozdata qualityen
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitungde
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modificationsen
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen
internal.identifier.thesoz10040714
internal.identifier.thesoz10037913
internal.identifier.thesoz10037911
internal.identifier.thesoz10036080
internal.identifier.thesoz10043653
internal.identifier.thesoz10035808
internal.identifier.thesoz10055811
dc.type.stockarticle
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo189-214
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal674
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2017.v11i2.6782
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence3
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record