dc.contributor.author | Melo, Jácia Kaline Ferreira de | |
dc.contributor.author | Davim, Rejane Marie Barbosa | |
dc.contributor.author | Silva, Richardson Algusto Rosendo da | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-10-11T13:39:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-10-11T13:39:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2175-5361 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/54047 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: to identify the opinion of postpartum women about the advantages and disadvantages of normal and caesarean delivery. Method: qualitative research conducted in rooming-in in a public maternity hospital in Natal/RN, with 21 postpartum women over 20 years old after 12 hours postpartum, which had before both normal as cesarean delivery. For data collection a semi-structured interview was used in March 2012, analyzed by content analysis technique. The ethical aspect of the study was approved and CAAE 0295.0.051.000-11 opinion. Results: after analysis two categories for the advantage and disadvantage of normal delivery were identified: fast recovery and strong contractions; in cesarean section, the advantage to not feel pain and disadvantage of a delayed recovery. Conclusion: it is important that health professionals guide women, especially to pregnant woman for the first time, clarifying questions about the two types of delivery. | en |
dc.language | en | |
dc.subject.ddc | Soziologie, Anthropologie | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Sociology & anthropology | en |
dc.subject.ddc | Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Social sciences, sociology, anthropology | en |
dc.subject.other | rooming-in | |
dc.title | Advantages and disadvantages of labour and normal cesarean: view puerperal | |
dc.title.alternative | Vantagens e desvantagens do parto normal e cesariano: opinião de puérperas | |
dc.title.alternative | Ventajas y desventajas de un parto normal y cesárea: opinión de puerperal | |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Revista de Pesquisa: Cuidado é Fundamental Online | |
dc.source.volume | 7 | |
dc.publisher.country | MISC | |
dc.source.issue | 4 | |
dc.subject.classoz | Medizinsoziologie | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Medical Sociology | en |
dc.subject.classoz | Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Women's Studies, Feminist Studies, Gender Studies | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Frau | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | woman | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Geburt | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | birth | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Geburtshilfe | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | obstetrics | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Entscheidung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | decision | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Methode | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | method | en |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-54047-4 | |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht-kommerz. 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 | en |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10038633 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10044666 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10044692 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10042174 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10036452 | |
dc.type.stock | article | |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 3197-3205 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10215 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 20200 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 439 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
dc.rights.sherpa | Grüner Verlag | de |
dc.rights.sherpa | Green Publisher | en |
internal.identifier.ddc | 301 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 300 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.9789/2175-5361.2015.v7i4.3197-3205 | |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.sherpa | 1 | |
internal.identifier.licence | 32 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.pdf.version | 1.5 | |
internal.pdf.valid | true | |
internal.pdf.wellformed | true | |
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizer | CERTAIN | |
internal.check.languageharmonizer | CERTAIN_RETAINED | |