dc.contributor.author | Hughes, Sarah M. | de |
dc.contributor.author | Haddaway, Samuel | de |
dc.contributor.author | Zhou, Hanzhi | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-10-26T14:30:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-10-26T14:30:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 2296-4754 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/48602 | |
dc.description.abstract | Research conducted over the past 30 years has demonstrated a reduction in errors and improvement in
data quality when face–to-face social surveys are carried out using computers instead of paper and
pencil. However, research examining the quality of data collected by interviewers using mobile devices is
in its infancy and is based in developed countries. In a small pilot study conducted during the World
Bank’s Kenya State of the Cities Baseline Survey, a face-to-face survey on living conditions,
infrastructure and service delivery, the authors compared the quality of data collected using smartphones
to data collected using tablets. The study of mobile touchscreen devices showed that tablets
outperformed phones in some cases, but that the results were highly dependent on the interviewer. | en |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Social sciences, sociology, anthropology | en |
dc.subject.other | Smartphone; Tablet | de |
dc.title | Comparing smartphones to tablets for face-to-face interviewing
in Kenya | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Survey Methods: Insights from the Field | |
dc.publisher.country | DEU | |
dc.subject.classoz | Erhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaften | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Methods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methods | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Mobiltelefon | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | cell phone | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Kenia | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Kenya | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | CATI | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | computer-assisted telephone interview | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Datenqualität | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | data quality | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Interview | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | interview | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Umfrageforschung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | survey research | en |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works | en |
internal.status | noch nicht fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10060117 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10035650 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10060120 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10055811 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037913 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040714 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 12 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10105 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 472 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 300 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2016-00001 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 2 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.pdf.version | 1.3 | |
internal.pdf.valid | true | |
internal.pdf.wellformed | true | |
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizer | CERTAIN | |
internal.check.languageharmonizer | CERTAIN_RETAINED | |