Show simple item record

[working paper]

dc.contributor.authorKlinkforth, Kristinade
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-29T07:50:50Z
dc.date.available2015-07-29T07:50:50Z
dc.date.issued2006de
dc.identifier.issn1434-419Xde
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/43987
dc.description.abstract"In the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks and the ensuing wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, concerns about the future role of NATO have unleashed a substantial debate among U.S. foreign policy experts and think tank analysts. In performing a qualitative content analysis, this paper comprehends and analyzes the unfolding discussion about the role of NATO currently conducted in the United States. In the policy-making process, think tanks are assumed to perform a double function. They shape the contents of a policy-relevant issue by advancing distinctive policy recommendations, and simultaneously carve out areas for consensus-building prior to the decisionmaking process. Accordingly, the first step of the analysis comprehends their approach, against which the line of argument regarding NATO as well as the policy recommendations are outlined. The prevailing issues of burdensharing and NATO enlargement furthermore provide a guideline that leads through the analysis. In a second step, major differences and overlaps between the camps are identified in order to carve out trends that are likely to prevail in future NATO politics. In the ensuing debate about NATO, four camps can be distinguished: libertarian, neoconservative, conservative, and liberal. While these camps outline distinct policy options, especially conservatives and liberals share the common objective of maintaining NATO well into the future. However, despite this commonly pursued goal, both camps remain skeptical towards NATO as a multilateral security organization and rather adopt an 'instrumentalist' view of NATO that is likely to extend into the future. In focusing on the input provided by think tanks concerning a particular policy debate, rather than the outcome of specific policies, this analysis also addresses an insufficiently-researched area of foreign policymaking and identifies implications for follow-up studies." (author's abstract)en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcInternationale Beziehungende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcInternational relationsen
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.titleNATO in U.S. policymaking and debate - an analysis: 'drawing the map' of the U.S. think; tank debate on NATO since 9/11de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtetde
dc.description.reviewrevieweden
dc.source.volume59de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.publisher.cityBerlinde
dc.source.seriesArbeitspapiere des Osteuropa-Instituts der Freien Universität Berlin, Arbeitsschwerpunkt Politik
dc.subject.classozPeace and Conflict Research, International Conflicts, Security Policyen
dc.subject.classozFriedens- und Konfliktforschung, Sicherheitspolitikde
dc.subject.classozInternational Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policyen
dc.subject.classozinternationale Beziehungen, Entwicklungspolitikde
dc.subject.thesozUSAde
dc.subject.thesozUnited States of Americaen
dc.subject.thesozNATOde
dc.subject.thesozNATOen
dc.subject.thesozSicherheitspolitikde
dc.subject.thesozsecurity policyen
dc.subject.thesozVerteidigungspolitikde
dc.subject.thesozdefense policyen
dc.subject.thesozinternationale Zusammenarbeitde
dc.subject.thesozinternational cooperationen
dc.subject.thesozExpertede
dc.subject.thesozexperten
dc.subject.thesozAußenpolitikde
dc.subject.thesozforeign policyen
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Entscheidungde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical decisionen
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Entwicklungde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical developmenten
dc.subject.thesoztransatlantische Beziehungende
dc.subject.thesoztransatlantic relationsen
dc.subject.thesozNordamerikade
dc.subject.thesozNorth Americaen
dc.subject.thesozThink Tankde
dc.subject.thesozthink tanken
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-439876
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitungde
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modificationsen
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10041244
internal.identifier.thesoz10053032
internal.identifier.thesoz10037376
internal.identifier.thesoz10034428
internal.identifier.thesoz10037395
internal.identifier.thesoz10043021
internal.identifier.thesoz10034694
internal.identifier.thesoz10042175
internal.identifier.thesoz10040704
internal.identifier.thesoz10039289
internal.identifier.thesoz10035407
internal.identifier.thesoz10082367
dc.type.stockmonographde
dc.type.documentArbeitspapierde
dc.type.documentworking paperen
dc.source.pageinfo82de
internal.identifier.classoz10505
internal.identifier.classoz10507
internal.identifier.document3
dc.contributor.corporateeditorFreie Universität Berlin, Osteuropa-Institut Abt. Politik
internal.identifier.corporateeditor601
internal.identifier.ddc327
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence3
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review2
dc.description.miscgesis-solis-00367788de
internal.identifier.series874
dc.subject.classhort10500de
internal.pdf.version1.4
internal.pdf.validtrue
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record