Show simple item record

Das Tun gebauter Räume beobachten: Ansätze einer Ethnographie der Materialität
[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorReh, Sabinede
dc.contributor.authorTemel, Robertde
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-07T09:13:35Z
dc.date.available2015-11-04T16:16:24Z
dc.date.issued2014de
dc.identifier.issn0172-6404
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/38511
dc.description.abstractThe paper makes a methodological contribution to the question as to which part built space plays in social practices. In doing so, we firstly use practice theory according to Schatzki as a theoretical basis to clarify the relationship between space and activity. For that, it is important to overcome with Schatzki (and Heidegger) the difference between subjective and objective space. This is made possible by making “lived space” not independent of or dependent on subjectivity, but dependent on activity. In a second step, we will use an example of ethnographic observation to show under which conditions and advertencies it was possible to recognize space’s part in activity. We describe what appeared by chance in observation theoretically with the concept of atmosphere in the third part. This concept was introduced into the discourse on architecture by Böhme, it was rendered more precisely by Seel, and we try to connect it to our starting point in practice theory. After applying the concept of atmosphere methodologically on observation, we cautiously draw methodical consequences from this for observation of built spaces as part of social practices.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherbuilt space; materiality; social practices; doings/ activity; agency; atmosphere; appearing
dc.titleObserving the doings of built spaces: attempts of an ethnography of materialityde
dc.title.alternativeDas Tun gebauter Räume beobachten: Ansätze einer Ethnographie der Materialitätde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalHistorical Social Research
dc.source.volume39de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozForschungsarten der Sozialforschungde
dc.subject.classozResearch Designen
dc.subject.thesozperceptionen
dc.subject.thesozzoneen
dc.subject.thesozobservationen
dc.subject.thesozactivityen
dc.subject.thesozWahrnehmungde
dc.subject.thesozAktivitätde
dc.subject.thesozRaumde
dc.subject.thesozGebäudede
dc.subject.thesozbuildingen
dc.subject.thesozEthnographiede
dc.subject.thesozBeobachtungde
dc.subject.thesozethnographyen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-385113
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
ssoar.contributor.institutionGESISde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10038149
internal.identifier.thesoz10044626
internal.identifier.thesoz10040719
internal.identifier.thesoz10042834
internal.identifier.thesoz10086289
internal.identifier.thesoz10034995
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo167-180de
internal.identifier.classoz10104
internal.identifier.journal152
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.source.issuetopicSpatial analysisde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.39.2014.2.167-180de
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
dc.subject.classhort10100de
internal.embargo.terms2015-10-17
internal.pdf.version1.3
internal.pdf.validtrue
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record