Volltext herunterladen
(1.080 MB)
Zitationshinweis
Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgenden Persistent Identifier (PID):
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-378903
Export für Ihre Literaturverwaltung
If you build it, will we come? Large scale digital infrastructures as a dead end for Digital Humanities
Wenn Ihr baut, werden wir wohnen? Digitale Infrastrukturen großen Maßstabs als Sackgasse für die Digitalen Geisteswissenschaften
[Zeitschriftenartikel]
Abstract "Programs aiming to develop large scale digital infrastructure for the humanities motivate this development mostly by the wish to leverage methodological innovation through digital and computational approaches. It is questionable, however, if large scale infrastructures are the right incubator model... mehr
"Programs aiming to develop large scale digital infrastructure for the humanities motivate this development mostly by the wish to leverage methodological innovation through digital and computational approaches. It is questionable, however, if large scale infrastructures are the right incubator model for bringing about such innovation. The necessary generalizations and standardizations, management and development processes that large infrastructures need to apply to cater to wholesale humanities are at odds with well-known aspects of innovation. Moreover, such generalizations dose off many possibilities for exploring new modeling and computing approaches. The author argues that methodological innovation and advancing the modeling of humanities data and heuristics is better served by flexible small-scale research focused development practices. It will also be shown that modeling highly specific distributed web services is a more promising avenue for sustainability of highly heterogeneous humanities digital data than standards enforcement and current encoding practices." (author's abstract)... weniger
Thesaurusschlagwörter
Digitalisierung; Geisteswissenschaft; Infrastruktur; Heuristik; Methodologie; Nachhaltigkeit; Innovation; Paradoxie; Technologie; Standardisierung; Forschung; Praxis; Workflow-Management
Klassifikation
Wissenschaftssoziologie, Wissenschaftsforschung, Technikforschung, Techniksoziologie
Methode
Grundlagenforschung
Sprache Dokument
Englisch
Publikationsjahr
2012
Seitenangabe
S. 165-186
Zeitschriftentitel
Historical Social Research, 37 (2012) 3
Heftthema
Kontroversen um die Digitalen Geisteswissenschaften / Controversies around the Digital Humanities
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.37.2012.3.165-186
ISSN
0172-6404
Status
Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet (peer reviewed)