dc.contributor.author | Baylis, Thomas A. | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-02-24T11:50:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-02-24T11:50:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 0172-6404 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/37357 | |
dc.description.abstract | "The concept of 'elite consensus' is pivotal to the work of John Higley and his associates, but like many key political concepts its meaning is not precise. Consensus implies broad agreement, but just how much agreement, over what matters, among whom (i.e., who are the relevant elites), and how enduring remain to be specified. Higley et al. recognize these problems, placing their emphasis on procedural rather than substantive agreement and granting that individual cases may lie somewhere on the borderline between elite consensus and disunity. In this essay I explore the consensus issue by examining several cases from East Central Europe and that of Germany in the aftermath of the fall of Communism. Higley and Burton see especially in the Polish and Hungarian 'roundtables' instances of near-contemporary 'elite settlements.' But in both cases observers have recently pointed to a degree of political polarization whose intensity seems to call into question the actual achievement of elite consensus and indeed of 'democratic consolidation.' I assess these apparently conflicting perspectives by examining the divergent views of the new political institutions and of the legitimacy of one another held by rival elites in Poland and Hungary and compare the cases of the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Germany." (author's abstract) | en |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Politikwissenschaft | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Geschichte | de |
dc.subject.ddc | History | en |
dc.subject.ddc | Political science | en |
dc.title | Elite consensus and political polarization: cases from Central Europe | de |
dc.title.alternative | litenkonsens und Politische Polarisierung: Fälle aus Mitteleuropa | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Historical Social Research | |
dc.source.volume | 37 | de |
dc.publisher.country | DEU | |
dc.source.issue | 1 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | allgemeine Geschichte | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture | en |
dc.subject.classoz | General History | en |
dc.subject.classoz | politische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kultur | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Bundesrepublik Deutschland | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | politisches System | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | post-socialist country | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Verfassung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Wahlsystem | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Elite | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Godesberger Programm | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Polen | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | politische Elite | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Transformation | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Tschechische Republik | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | electoral system | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Federal Republic of Germany | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | legitimation | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Europa | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | elite research | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Slovakia | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Eliteforschung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | political actor | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Mitteleuropa | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | constitution | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Slowakei | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Legitimation | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | postsozialistisches Land | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | political elite | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | transformation | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Europe | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | democratization | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Czech Republic | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Godesberg Program (SPD) | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | elite | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Central Europe | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Konsens | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | polarization | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | politischer Akteur | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Poland | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | political system | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Demokratisierung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Ungarn | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | East Central Europe | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Polarisierung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Ostmitteleuropa | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | consensus | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Hungary | en |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-373578 | |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 | en |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 | de |
ssoar.gesis.collection | aDIS | de |
ssoar.contributor.institution | GESIS | |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10042880 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10042879 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10041891 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10045348 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10035023 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10064237 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10041908 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10064200 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10038467 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10046088 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10064243 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10052027 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10045843 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10046005 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037571 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10050763 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10060698 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040703 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10063279 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10054686 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040669 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10042883 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.source.pageinfo | 90-106 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 30301 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10504 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 152 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 320 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 900 | |
dc.source.issuetopic | Elite foundations of social theory and politics / Elitetheoretische Grundlagen sozialwissenschaftlicher Theoriebildung und politischer Analyse | de |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.37.2012.1.90-106 | |
dc.subject.methods | empirisch | de |
dc.subject.methods | historical | en |
dc.subject.methods | empirisch-qualitativ | de |
dc.subject.methods | empirical | en |
dc.subject.methods | Theorieanwendung | de |
dc.subject.methods | theory application | en |
dc.subject.methods | historisch | de |
dc.subject.methods | qualitative empirical | en |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
internal.identifier.licence | 16 | |
internal.identifier.methods | 15 | |
internal.identifier.methods | 5 | |
internal.identifier.methods | 4 | |
internal.identifier.methods | 9 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
dc.description.misc | gesis-solis-00573008 | de |
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizer | CERTAIN | |
internal.check.languageharmonizer | CERTAIN_RETAINED | |