Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorHutchings, Paul B.de
dc.contributor.authorHaddock, Geoffreyde
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-10T03:05:00Zde
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-29T23:02:19Z
dc.date.available2012-08-29T23:02:19Z
dc.date.issued2008de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/26287
dc.description.abstractResearch has demonstrated that individuals high in implicit prejudice are more likely to classify a racially ambiguous angry face as Black compared to individuals low in implicit prejudice (Hugenberg & Bodenhausen, 2004). The current study sought to replicate and extend this finding by examining whether the same expression of anger on a racially ambiguous face is perceived to be differentially intense when the face is judged to be Black or White. White participants viewed racially ambiguous, White, and Black faces displaying angry, neutral, or happy emotions. Participants’ task was to identify the race, emotion, and intensity of emotion display. The results revealed that participants high in implicit prejudice reported significantly more of the racially ambiguous angry faces as Black compared to participants low in implicit prejudice. Further, participants high in implicit prejudice reported the intensity of the racially ambiguous angry emotion as greater when the same face had been categorized as Black compared to White. The results suggest that implicit prejudice is not only associated with the racial categorization of an ambiguous face but also the perceived intensity of the emotion displayed.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPsychologyen
dc.subject.ddcPsychologiede
dc.subject.otherImplicit prejudice; Race perception
dc.titleLook Black in Anger: The role of implicit prejudice in the categorization and perceived emotional intensity of racially ambiguous facesen
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalJournal of Experimental Social Psychologyde
dc.source.volume44de
dc.source.issue5de
dc.subject.classozSocial Psychologyen
dc.subject.classozSozialpsychologiede
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-262878de
dc.date.modified2011-08-10T09:46:00Zde
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)de
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)en
ssoar.gesis.collectionSOLIS;ADISde
ssoar.contributor.institutionhttp://www.peerproject.eu/de
internal.status3de
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.rights.copyrightfde
dc.source.pageinfo1418-1420
internal.identifier.classoz10706
internal.identifier.journal199de
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc150
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.05.002de
dc.description.pubstatusPostprinten
dc.description.pubstatusPostprintde
internal.identifier.licence7
internal.identifier.pubstatus2
internal.identifier.review1
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record