Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorZhang, Fangzhude
dc.contributor.authorCooke, Philde
dc.contributor.authorWu, Fulongde
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-12T02:57:00Zde
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-29T22:34:07Z
dc.date.available2012-08-29T22:34:07Z
dc.date.issued2010de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/25056
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the model of China's biotechnology innovation. We apply the typology of entrepreneurial, partnership, and developmental state, to the Chinese biotechnology sector. Biotechnology development in China originates from state-sponsored programs. Chinese biotechnology research capacities experience fast growth. The state funding plays a crucial role in the latecomer situation. Geographically, biotechnology industries are concentrated in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen and other major cities. The state promotes biotechnology development. However, such a model has its problems: the lack of sustained funding and under-developed venture capital, weak link between research and industry, and under-performed IP output. Faced with the funding constraint, contract research organizations (CROs) have recently become proliferated. Despite the strong role of state, we conclude that the Chinese model of biotechnology innovation is a hybrid one, rather than the classical one of developmental state, which combines various elements of different models.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.otherResearch and development (R&D); Biotechnology; Innovation model
dc.titleState-sponsored R&D: a case study of China's biotechnologyen
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalRegional Studiesde
dc.source.volume45de
dc.publisher.countryGBR
dc.source.issue5de
dc.subject.classozSpecial areas of Departmental Policyen
dc.subject.classozspezielle Ressortpolitikde
dc.subject.classozWissenschaftssoziologie, Wissenschaftsforschung, Technikforschung, Techniksoziologiede
dc.subject.classozSociology of Science, Sociology of Technology, Research on Science and Technologyen
dc.subject.thesozChinade
dc.subject.thesozInnovationde
dc.subject.thesozinnovationen
dc.subject.thesozChinaen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-250565de
dc.date.modified2011-05-12T14:38:00Zde
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)de
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)en
ssoar.gesis.collectionSOLIS;ADISde
ssoar.contributor.institutionhttp://www.peerproject.eu/de
internal.status3de
internal.identifier.thesoz10047538
internal.identifier.thesoz10040272
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.rights.copyrightfde
dc.source.pageinfo575-595
internal.identifier.classoz10508
internal.identifier.classoz10220
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc320
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/00343401003604663de
dc.description.pubstatusPostprinten
dc.description.pubstatusPostprintde
internal.identifier.licence7
internal.identifier.pubstatus2
internal.identifier.review1
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record