Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorPotrafke, Niklasde
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-08T02:51:00Zde
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-29T23:15:23Z
dc.date.available2012-08-29T23:15:23Z
dc.date.issued2010de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/24983
dc.description.abstractThis paper empirically investigates the influence of globalization on various aspects of labor market deregulation. I employ the data set by Bassanini and Duval (2006) on labor market institutions in OECD countries and the KOF index of globalization. The data set covers 20 OECD countries in the 1982–2003 period. The results suggest that globalization did neither influence the unemployment replacement rate, the unemployment benefit length, public expenditures on ALMP, the tax wedge, union density nor overall employment protection. In contrast, protection of regular employment contracts was diminished when globalization was proceeding rapidly. In fact, domestic aspects, such as unemployment and government ideology are more important determinants of labor market institutions and deregulation processes in OECD countries than globalization. For this reason, working conditions of unskilled workers are not likely to deteriorate and the jobs of unskilled workers are not likely to disappear in the course of globalization. All this is, of course, not to insinuate that globalization has any benign influence on labor market institutions.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcWirtschaftde
dc.subject.ddcEconomicsen
dc.subject.otherlabor market (de)regulation; globalization; panel data; F57; F16; J58; J88; C23
dc.titleLabor market deregulation and globalization: empirical evidence from OECD countriesen
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalReview of World Economicsde
dc.source.volume146de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.source.issue3de
dc.subject.classozArbeitsmarktforschungde
dc.subject.classozLabor Market Researchen
dc.subject.classozLabor Market Policyen
dc.subject.classozArbeitsmarktpolitikde
dc.subject.thesozArbeitsmarktde
dc.subject.thesozglobalizationen
dc.subject.thesozOECD-Staatde
dc.subject.thesozBeschäftigungseffektde
dc.subject.thesozDeregulierungde
dc.subject.thesozOECD member countryen
dc.subject.thesozGlobalisierungde
dc.subject.thesozeffect on employmenten
dc.subject.thesozderegulationen
dc.subject.thesozlabor marketen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-249836de
dc.date.modified2011-05-09T09:49:00Zde
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)de
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)en
ssoar.gesis.collectionSOLIS;ADISde
ssoar.contributor.institutionhttp://www.peerproject.eu/de
internal.status3de
internal.identifier.thesoz10047291
internal.identifier.thesoz10036392
internal.identifier.thesoz10047868
internal.identifier.thesoz10038734
internal.identifier.thesoz10040761
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.rights.copyrightfde
dc.source.pageinfo545-571
internal.identifier.classoz20101
internal.identifier.classoz20103
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc330
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-010-0056-8de
dc.subject.methodsempirischde
dc.subject.methodsempirisch-quantitativde
dc.subject.methodsempiricalen
dc.subject.methodsquantitative empiricalen
dc.description.pubstatusPostprinten
dc.description.pubstatusPostprintde
internal.identifier.licence7
internal.identifier.methods4
internal.identifier.methods6
internal.identifier.pubstatus2
internal.identifier.review1
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record