dc.contributor.author | Nöhammer, Elisabeth | de |
dc.contributor.author | Stummer, Harald | de |
dc.contributor.author | Schusterschitz, Claudia | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-04-06T03:00:00Z | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-29T22:29:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-29T22:29:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/24412 | |
dc.description.abstract | Aim: The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential of worksite health promotion to improve individual well-being from the employees' perspective, analyze benefit categories and develop suggestions for future worksite health promotion program designs. Subjects and methods: A questionnaire based on a qualitative study was distributed in four Austrian organizations to cover state-owned, private, and non-profit organizations. A total of 237 white-collar employees participated in the survey. Results: Workplace health promotion does improve individual well-being from the employees' perspective. A factor analysis of the changes in well-being reported yields a three-factor solution with a physical/ cognitive element, a social component, and an emotional factor. In the sample tested, the physical-cognitive and emotional elements of perceived benefits were felt the most. Conclusion: The current theoretical grouping of potential WHP effects requires further testing and might profit from being differentiated into more categories. Research on WHP could gain from a consideration of the employee's perspective by showing which program elements to focus on. Strengthening the emotional components of WHP information and program elements is proposed for increasing participation rates and the subsequent individual benefits derived. | en |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Sociology & anthropology | en |
dc.subject.ddc | Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Social sciences, sociology, anthropology | en |
dc.subject.ddc | Medicine and health | en |
dc.subject.ddc | Medizin und Gesundheit | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Soziologie, Anthropologie | de |
dc.subject.other | Workplace; Health promotion; Effect; Benefit; Employee perspective | |
dc.title | Improving employee well-being through worksite health promotion? The employees' perspective | en |
dc.title.alternative | Verbesserung des Wohlbefindens der Mitarbeiter durch betriebliche Gesundheitsförderung? Die Mitarbeiterperspektive | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Journal of Public Health | de |
dc.source.volume | 19 | de |
dc.publisher.country | DEU | |
dc.source.issue | 2 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Medizin, Sozialmedizin | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Health Policy | en |
dc.subject.classoz | Medizinsoziologie | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Gesundheitspolitik | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Medical Sociology | en |
dc.subject.classoz | Medicine, Social Medicine | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Gesundheitsvorsorge | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | salaried employee | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Austria | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | well-being | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Auswirkung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | health care | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | job | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Österreich | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Prävention | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | prevention | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Mitarbeiter | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Effektivität | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | effectiveness | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Gesundheitszustand | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Faktorenanalyse | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | impact | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | factor analysis | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | health status | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Angestellter | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Wohlbefinden | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Arbeitsplatz | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | co-worker | en |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-244123 | de |
dc.date.modified | 2011-09-30T09:46:00Z | de |
dc.rights.licence | PEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project) | de |
dc.rights.licence | PEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project) | en |
ssoar.gesis.collection | SOLIS;ADIS | de |
ssoar.contributor.institution | http://www.peerproject.eu/ | de |
internal.status | 3 | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10035622 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10045507 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10036501 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040166 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10055075 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10038100 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10045580 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10041419 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037482 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10035494 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10045579 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.rights.copyright | f | de |
dc.source.pageinfo | 121-129 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10215 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 50100 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 11006 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 203 | de |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 610 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 300 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 301 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-010-0364-4 | de |
dc.subject.methods | empirisch | de |
dc.subject.methods | empirisch-quantitativ | de |
dc.subject.methods | empirical | en |
dc.subject.methods | anwendungsorientiert | de |
dc.subject.methods | applied research | en |
dc.subject.methods | quantitative empirical | en |
dc.description.pubstatus | Postprint | en |
dc.description.pubstatus | Postprint | de |
internal.identifier.licence | 7 | |
internal.identifier.methods | 1 | |
internal.identifier.methods | 4 | |
internal.identifier.methods | 6 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 2 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizer | CERTAIN | |
internal.check.languageharmonizer | CERTAIN_RETAINED | |