Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorHuxham, Markde
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-01T06:38:00Zde
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-30T04:47:48Z
dc.date.available2012-08-30T04:47:48Z
dc.date.issued2005de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/23092
dc.description.abstractMany educational development resources recommend making conventional lectures more interactive. However, there is little firm evidence supporting either the acceptability (to students) or efficacy of doing so. This research examined the use of short ‘interactive windows’ (discussions and problem-solving exercises) in first year evolution lectures delivered to between 73 and 126 students over five years. Semi-structured evaluations of the teaching, involving more than 500 responses, identified the interactive nature of the lectures as the single most popular feature of the sessions. The division of the year class into two separate groups allowed the opportunistic testing of how interactive windows influenced learning about discrete problems within each lecture. Two short problem-solving or discussion sessions were devised for each lecture; one of these sessions was taught interactively to the first student group, the second was taught interactively to the second group. Comparing test scores achieved in questions addressing these paired problems showed strong evidence for a generally weak, positive influence of the interactive windows on recall and learning.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.otherbuzz groups; interaction; lectures; recall;
dc.titleLearning in lecturesen
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalActive Learning in Higher Educationde
dc.source.volume6de
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.thesozEvaluationde
dc.subject.thesozevaluationen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-230927de
dc.date.modified2011-03-01T06:38:00Zde
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)de
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)en
ssoar.contributor.institutionhttp://www.peerproject.eu/de
internal.status-1de
internal.identifier.thesoz10039188
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo17-31
internal.identifier.journal8de
internal.identifier.document32
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1469787405049943de
dc.description.pubstatusPostprinten
dc.description.pubstatusPostprintde
internal.identifier.licence7
internal.identifier.pubstatus2
internal.identifier.review1
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record