dc.contributor.author | Toshkov, Dimiter | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-03-01T06:11:00Z | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-29T22:41:33Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-29T22:41:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/22941 | |
dc.description.abstract | Accession to the European Union (EU) demands the adoption of a vast body of legislation. This paper analyses compliance with EU directives in eight post-communist countries during the Eastern enlargement and tries to account for the puzzling embrace of EU law in Central and Eastern Europe. Drawing on a new data set tracking the transposition of a sample of 119 directives, the paper finds effects of both political preferences and government capacity on the likelihood of timely transposition. Furthermore, important sectoral differences are uncovered, with trade-related legislation having a better chance and environmental legislation having a significantly worse chance of being incorporated into national legal systems on time. Beyond the conditionality of the accession process, the paper unveils a complex causal structure behind the ups and downs in transposition performance. | en |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Staatsformen und Regierungssysteme | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Systems of governments & states | en |
dc.subject.ddc | Politikwissenschaft | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Political science | en |
dc.subject.other | Central and Eastern Europe; compliance; Enlargement; transposition; | |
dc.title | Embracing European Law: Compliance with EU Directives in Central and Eastern Europe | en |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | European Union Politics | de |
dc.source.volume | 9 | de |
dc.source.issue | 3 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Staat, staatliche Organisationsformen | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Europapolitik | de |
dc.subject.classoz | European Politics | en |
dc.subject.classoz | Political System, Constitution, Government | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Implementation | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | implementation | en |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-229415 | de |
dc.date.modified | 2011-05-04T16:29:00Z | de |
dc.rights.licence | PEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project) | de |
dc.rights.licence | PEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project) | en |
ssoar.gesis.collection | SOLIS;ADIS | de |
ssoar.contributor.institution | http://www.peerproject.eu/ | de |
internal.status | 3 | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10047087 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.rights.copyright | f | de |
dc.source.pageinfo | 379-402 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10503 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10506 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 126 | de |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 321 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 320 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116508093490 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Postprint | en |
dc.description.pubstatus | Postprint | de |
internal.identifier.licence | 7 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 2 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizer | CERTAIN | |
internal.check.languageharmonizer | CERTAIN_RETAINED | |