dc.contributor.author | Garcia, Stephen M. | de |
dc.contributor.author | Miller, Dale T. | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-03-01T05:55:00Z | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-30T04:47:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-30T04:47:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/22846 | |
dc.description.abstract | Six studies explored the hypothesis that third parties are averse to resolving preference disputes with winner-take-all solutions when disputing factions belong to different social categories (e.g. gender, nationality, firms, etc.) versus the same social category. Studies 1—3 showed that third parties' aversion to winner-take-all solutions, even when they are based on the unbiased toss of a coin, is greater when the disputed preferences correlate with social category membership than when they do not. Studies 4—6 suggested that reluctance to resolve inter-category disputes in a winner-take-all manner is motivated by a desire to minimize the affective disparity—the hedonic gap—between the winning and losing sides. The implication is that winner-take-all outcomes, even those that satisfy conditions of procedural fairness, become unacceptable when disputed preferences cleave along social category lines. | en |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.other | behavioral economics; competition; decision-making; distributive justice; group disputes; social categories; social comparison; | |
dc.title | Social Categories and Group Preference Disputes: The Aversion to Winner-Take-All Solutions | en |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Group Processes & Intergroup Relations | de |
dc.source.volume | 10 | de |
dc.source.issue | 4 | de |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-228460 | de |
dc.date.modified | 2011-03-01T05:55:00Z | de |
dc.rights.licence | PEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project) | de |
dc.rights.licence | PEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project) | en |
ssoar.contributor.institution | http://www.peerproject.eu/ | de |
internal.status | -1 | de |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.source.pageinfo | 581-593 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 147 | de |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207084721 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Postprint | en |
dc.description.pubstatus | Postprint | de |
internal.identifier.licence | 7 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 2 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizer | CERTAIN | |
internal.check.languageharmonizer | CERTAIN_RETAINED | |