Volltext herunterladen
(564.5 KB)
Zitationshinweis
Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgenden Persistent Identifier (PID):
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-84493-9
Export für Ihre Literaturverwaltung
Do EU consumers think about meat reduction when considering to eat a healthy, sustainable diet and to have a role in food system change?
[Zeitschriftenartikel]
Abstract This paper aims to highlight the position of meat reduction in what EU consumers think "eating a healthy and sustainable diet" involves and who has a role to play in achieving food system change. The data are based on the Eurobarometer 93.2 survey (mid 2020). The participants were asked to make thei... mehr
This paper aims to highlight the position of meat reduction in what EU consumers think "eating a healthy and sustainable diet" involves and who has a role to play in achieving food system change. The data are based on the Eurobarometer 93.2 survey (mid 2020). The participants were asked to make their own selections out of a variety of food-related items and actors, linked to meat ("Eating meat less often") and other aspects of diets ("Eating more fruit and vegetables"). Their responses were analyzed separately in two EU regions: Northwest Europe - consisting of the 10 richest EU countries with the highest scores on economic and social sustainable development indicators - and the East and the South. Three principal components of dietary thinking were distinguished, relating to 1) nutrition issues, 2) easy “light green" issues and 3) more demanding "deeper green" issues, respectively. The analysis also distinguished three types of actors in the value chain (food chain actors, supporting actors, and governmental actors). In Northwestern Europe, a majority of consumers saw a role for themselves in making the food system more sustainable and a large minority saw meat reduction as part of a healthy and sustainable diet. Both responses were much less common in the East and South. In the Northwest, meat reduction was relatively strongly related to "deeper green" thinking but also weakly to nutrition-focused thinking, whereas the opposite was found in the East and South. However, meat reduction had no prominent position in their considerations. For policy-makers, therefore, it is crucial that both nutrition and environment can be motivating factors for consumers to consider meat reduction, albeit to different degrees.... weniger
Thesaurusschlagwörter
Gesundheitsverhalten; Lebensmittel; sozialer Wandel; Konsum; Ernährung; Verbraucher; Eurobarometer; Nachhaltigkeit; Verantwortung; Essverhalten; EU
Klassifikation
Medizinsoziologie
Sozialpsychologie
Ökologie und Umwelt
Freie Schlagwörter
protein; Eurobarometer 91.3 (2019) (ZA7572 v1.0.0); Eurobarometer 93.2 (2020) (ZA7739 v1.0.0)
Sprache Dokument
Englisch
Publikationsjahr
2021
Seitenangabe
S. 1-9
Zeitschriftentitel
Appetite : determinants and consequences of eating and drinking (2021) 170
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105880
ISSN
0195-6663
Status
Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet (peer reviewed)