Download full text
(external source)
Citation Suggestion
Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3519
Exports for your reference manager
You're Definitely Wrong, Maybe: Correction Style Has Minimal Effect on Corrections of Misinformation Online
[journal article]
Abstract How can online communication most effectively respond to misinformation posted on social media? Recent studies examining the content of corrective messages provide mixed results - several studies suggest that politer, hedged messages may increase engagement with corrections, while others favor direc... view more
How can online communication most effectively respond to misinformation posted on social media? Recent studies examining the content of corrective messages provide mixed results - several studies suggest that politer, hedged messages may increase engagement with corrections, while others favor direct messaging which does not shed doubt on the credibility of the corrective message. Furthermore, common debunking strategies often include keeping the message simple and clear, while others recommend including a detailed explanation of why the initial misinformation is incorrect. To shed more light on how correction style affects correction efficacy, we manipulated both correction strength (direct, hedged) and explanatory depth (simple explanation, detailed explanation) in response to participants from Lucid (N = 2,228) who indicated they would share a false story in a survey experiment. We found minimal evidence suggesting that correction strength or depth affects correction engagement, both in terms of likelihood of replying, and accepting or resisting corrective information. However, we do find that analytic thinking and actively open-minded thinking are associated with greater acceptance of information in response to corrective messages, regardless of correction style. Our results help elucidate the efficacy of user-generated corrections of misinformation on social media.... view less
Classification
Interactive, electronic Media
Free Keywords
cognitive reflection test; corrections; dark participation; debunking; fake news; misinformation; social media
Document language
English
Publication Year
2021
Page/Pages
p. 120-133
Journal
Media and Communication, 9 (2021) 1
Issue topic
Dark Participation in Online Communication: The World of the Wicked Web
ISSN
2183-2439
Status
Published Version; peer reviewed