Zitationshinweis
Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgenden Persistent Identifier (PID):
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v2i4.1181
Export für Ihre Literaturverwaltung
Plowshares or Swords? Fostering Common Ground Across Difference
[Zeitschriftenartikel]
Abstract With political polarization challenging forward progress on public policy and planning processes, it is critical to examine possibilities for finding common ground across difference between community participants. In my research on contentious planning processes in the United States, I found four ar... mehr
With political polarization challenging forward progress on public policy and planning processes, it is critical to examine possibilities for finding common ground across difference between community participants. In my research on contentious planning processes in the United States, I found four areas of convergence between participants over transportation policy and process related to public process and substantive matters. These convergences warrant planners' attention because they united stakeholders coming from different vantage points.... weniger
Klassifikation
Raumplanung und Regionalforschung
spezielle Ressortpolitik
Freie Schlagwörter
agonism; agonistic ethos; common ground; conflict resolution; sustainability planning
Sprache Dokument
Englisch
Publikationsjahr
2017
Seitenangabe
S. 133-136
Zeitschriftentitel
Urban Planning, 2 (2017) 4
Heftthema
Social Ecology of Sustainability
ISSN
2183-7635
Status
Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet