Volltext herunterladen
(externe Quelle)
Zitationshinweis
Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgenden Persistent Identifier (PID):
https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2010.v4i3.4620
Export für Ihre Literaturverwaltung
Elaborate item count questioning: why do people underreport in item count responses?
Elaborierte Item-Count-Befragung: warum machen die Befragten zu geringe Angaben bei den Item-Count-Antworten?
[Zeitschriftenartikel]
Abstract "The item count technique, used often to investigate illegal or socially undesirable behaviors, requires respondents to indicate merely the number of applicable items from among a list. However, the number of applicable items indicated via the item count question tends to be smaller than when it is ... mehr
"The item count technique, used often to investigate illegal or socially undesirable behaviors, requires respondents to indicate merely the number of applicable items from among a list. However, the number of applicable items indicated via the item count question tends to be smaller than when it is calculated from the direct 'applies/ does not apply' responses to each item. Because this inconsistency, which we refer to as the underreporting effect, often disturbs proper item count estimates, the causes of this effect are explored in this paper. Web survey results revealed that the order of the response alternatives is irrelevant to the underreporting effect, and that the underreporting effect is caused by the response format in which the item count question requests merely the number of applicable items and not the number of non-applicable items. It is also shown that the magnitude of the underreporting effect decreases when the respondents are asked to indicate the numbers of both applicable and non-applicable items, which the authors refer to as elaborate item count questioning." (author's abstract)... weniger
Thesaurusschlagwörter
Methodenforschung; Befragung; Antwortverhalten; empirische Sozialforschung; Fragebogen; Anonymität; Messung; Messinstrument; Fehler; Gruppe; Vergleich; Konsistenz
Klassifikation
Erhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaften
Allgemeines, spezielle Theorien und Schulen, Methoden, Entwicklung und Geschichte der Psychologie
Sprache Dokument
Englisch
Publikationsjahr
2010
Seitenangabe
S. 139-149
Zeitschriftentitel
Survey Research Methods, 4 (2010) 3
ISSN
1864-3361
Status
Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet (peer reviewed)
Lizenz
Deposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitung